1.0 Can the word wave be used to designate an object? 2.0 Spherical wave Hazelhurst proposes that light and gravity are mediated by spherical waves. Not a valid physical object. What is waving is nothing (energy) aether, light waves do not need a medium to travel through propagate through space. spherical waves. Converted the wave into a wave packet. Spherical wave radial versus linear, but still doesn't give us a clue as to what underlies this motion. The idiots of mathematics insinuate that physical objects are in fact made of motion. The string of string theory proposes so much. A particle is actually a vibrating string. So what is a string? A string is made of particles, meaning points, meaning that you can locate a location within the string, meaning that we mathematicians can specify a location on a string with a set of coordinates, meaning numbers. "The concept of frequency makes sense only when applied to a wave" (p. 91) [1] Against all rationality, Penrose attempts to illustrate the infamous wave-packet. (pp. 248-249, Figs. 6.13 and 6.14) It looks like and he describes it as a cork-screw. You shouldn't miss it if you really want to have some clean fun. The mathematicians at Oxford are a bunch of comedians. They really have to be kidding if this is what they pass on to their students from generation to generation. Of course we can't visualize a wave-packet! A wave-packet is not an impossible object. A wave-packet is an irrational object: one you cannot even imagine or draw. A wave stretches from here to infinity. A particle doesn't extend at all. So how are you supposed to reconcile the discrete with the infinite? You can't. The idiots of Mathematics could have rejected these two proposals a long time ago. Instead, the stupid morons who assisted at the 1927 5th Solvay Conference in Brussels chose to blend them into an unfathomable monster known as a wave-packet. They and their successors having been selling this garbage to the public ever since. Not surprisingly, the contemporary mathematicians can explain all of the properties of light with this irrational 'entity.' I ask, 'Why take the trouble?' Why not just explain reality with spirits and angels or whatever? What's the difference? What's the wave-packet got to do with science? "One key point to keep in mind about the water wave is that it is not made up of water: The wave is made up of energy" [3] “ Electromagnetic waves differ from other transverse and longitudinal waves in that
they do not need a medium ...to travel through.” [1]