Quantum mathematicians don't believe in the wave, but use it for tough cases
Travels One way Two anti parallel waves can make a standing wave, but then stretch all the way from Andromeda. Tunneling Transfer a particle versus stretching a wave. Travels as a wave but arrives as a particle. Photon is both wave and particle. Allows the mathematicians to answer all questions. Duality is a synonym of paradox and paradox means the mathematicians have no idea what they're talking about. A spherical wave is no different than a wave packet. In fact it is a wave packet that instead of moving forward or sidewards moves radially. Proponents of spherical wave have not invented anything new, and the only thing that they still need to clarify is what it is that is waving.
" In order for electromagnetic forces to be transferred from here to there, there must be something called field for this transfer. As is well known by now, electromagnetism needs medium for communicating waves (e.g., light), and therefore there must be a field from here to there; so it is impossible that absolute nothingness reigns in between." [1] " empty space is still something!” [1]
[If it is something, you answered your own question, dummy! Let's see if we can help the disadvantaged people who study at Kyoto University]
1. Waves must travel through something 2. Therefore, there must be something and not nothing between here and there. 3. Empty space (absolute nothingness) is still something. 4. Which means that waves of light can travel through completely, absolutely empty space (i.e., nothing) because empty space is something, which was the requirement of point 1. Nevertheless, Uchi's version is at odds with his Western counterparts:
" Electromagnetic waves differ from other transverse and longitudinal waves in that they do not need a medium ...to travel through.” [3] " light waves can pass through many media: air, water, glass, to name a few. But they do not need any medium. Sunlight, moonlight, and starlight pass through the vacuum of outer space to reach us..." [So vacuum is nothing: no medium. This contradicts the formal Quantum version that there is no such thing as vacuum (i.e., absolute empty space, no medium, etc.)]
" ... The source of all waves is something vibrating. The vibrating prongs of a tuning fork generate a sound. Vibrating electrons in an atom generate light. The basic difference between sound and light travel is that sound requires an intervening substance to change and impose a wave pattern on. Whereas light does not." [4] " Conduction is the transfer of thermal energy through free electron diffusion or phonon vibration, without a flow of the material medium...Conduction does not occur at all in a perfect vacuum." [5] [How would they know? 'Perfect vacuum' doesn't exist in Mathematical Physics (i.e.,Quantum Mechanics, General Relativity, or String Theory)] Unfortunately, Einstein's ignorance of the scientific method set the wrong precedent. The groundwork he laid led his disciples to appalling conclusions on other issues as well. Since the shoe didn’t fit Cinderella’s whoppers, the prince’s blacksmiths pounded the toes into submission. Rather than reject the wave and the particle models for light and the electron, the birdbrains blended them into a single hypothesis. Today we have the wave-packet or the state vector or the wave function or whatever the idiots call ‘it’ nowadays. The invisible entities underlying light and the electron are simultaneously particles and waves. The mathematicians needed this duality to explain what they observed in the lab. What is more appalling is that the mathematicians are pretty much convinced that neither light nor the electron can be a particle. Nevertheless, they continue to use the model because it is ‘useful’ rather than spend the time brainstorming other possibilities. The reason the mathematicians have not proposed new architectures and configurations is that they have concluded that such a task is outside the purview of science. They delegate such matters to philosophers. The philosophers, for their part, are not in the business of brainstorming either. They take their cues from Mathematical Physicists, the people they consider to be the ‘brains’ of science. If the ‘physicist’ says that light is a wave and a corpuscle simultaneously, no one is going to argue with them. So no one erases the board and questions the status quo. 3000 years later, we are still explaining a spring mechanism with little balls, and have no idea what causes electromagnetism or gravity. Anderson's ridiculous 'positron' exemplifies the faulty logic that equations can tell us something about the architecture of an invisible entity. aThe mathematicians are into doing. They have no interest in architecture. They are not interested in knowing what light looks like. They regard these matters to be the province of philosophy. That's why they don't know what light looks like or what an atom looks like or what the Universe looks like. They just care to model behavior of an invisible entity with their equations. If they can 'predict' the invisible entity's next move, they believe that they have identified it and no more needs to be said. The mathematicians have concocted all kinds of equations to explain the behavior of light. All these equations assume that light is a particle. Of course, if light is really a rope, the mathematicians have been misconceiving their physical interpretations all these years and applying their equations to explain the motion of the wrong object. This explains why Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity have supernatural and irrational explanations for physical phenomena.