Okay Al! I am drilling in a clockwise direction as you asked me. |
No you're not, Steve! You are drilling in a counter clockwise direction! I can see it from here! |
Oh brother! That's what I get for relying on the employment agency. I asked for one carpenter, and they sent me two mechanics! |
I'm telling you that the rope is twirling clockwise, Newt! |
This is fun. I should probably let them make asses of each other for about another hour. |
And I am telling you that the rope is turning counter clock wise, Steve! |
Adapted for the Internet from: Why God Doesn't Exist |
Particles have no way of simulating entanglement |
Fig. 1 (Dynamic) EPR in a nutshell |
An atom shoots two photons (or electrons) in diametrical directions. If one of the photons is confirmed to be spinning CW (or up in Fig 2 below), the other instantly spins CCW. Question: How does one photon ‘know’ what happened to the other, especially if they are light years apart? |
Fig. 3 Dynamic EPR (genuine spin: rotation) |
EPR states that if an atom emits two quantum ‘particles’ in opposite directions, they have opposite spins. If we compel one particle to reverse its rotation, the other one instantly does the same. How does one particle communicate what it’s doing to the other? The mechanics have concocted all sorts of supernatural explanations for EPR, including time travel and other worlds. |
Fig. 4 Static EPR |
Fig. 2 Static 'spin' |
end, the rope is oriented down-up. We're done! The ONLY way to explain what the Quantum mathematicians 'observe' in their labs is with a continuous agent such as a rope! You cannot explain this phenomenon with one way waves or particles. The mechanics should have realized this decades ago, but Bohr and Heisenberg told them that it is impossible to imagine this in the macro world. The mathematicians bowed to authority and never brainstormed further. |
Under the rope hypothesis, EPR is among the easiest phenomena to explain. Stretch a rope parallel to your line of sight. If it is spinning CW, the other end spins CCW. End of story! To think that it took 80 years to resolve this simple observation! The mechanics have no shame! |