| SR photons contract; GR photons expand |
- 1.0 How the mathematicians stretch their photons
Assuming relativists pass the ‘local’ and ‘flatness’ tests, SR’s ‘flat’ regime is still at odds with GR’s
inflationary theory. General Relativity alleges that the expansion of space causes the galaxies that sit on the
space-time sphere to recede. Kaufmann illustrates a boy blowing a balloon covered with coins, which
recede from each other as the balloon expands:
- “ The expanding universe can be compared to the expanding surface of an inflating
balloon.” (pg. 555, Fig. 28-1) [1]
A single frame in the film that Kaufmann ‘explains’ shows a Universe consisting of three spatial dimensions
– length, width, and height. To be consistent, the space within a boy should also expand. If the space within
the boy or between the boy and his destination is attempting to expand while the boy and the distance he
travels are trying to contract, it would seem that GR and SR are working at cross-purposes. Of course, if SR
has nothing to do with the real world, we don’t have to worry about this objection. But relativists argue that
the physical interpretations of SR describe the real world. This claim does require a firm response.
Relativists answer that you do not expand during spatial inflation because this cosmic phenomenon only
affects super macho objects like galaxies. According to relativity, insignificant entities like you overcome
this expansion at the ‘local’ level through either gravity or electromagnetic forces. Some say that it is gravity:
- “ Einstein and others have established that an object that is held together by its
own gravity, such as a galaxy, is always contained within a patch of non-expanding
space… Thus, the Earth and your body, for instance, are not getting any bigger.
Only the distance between widely separated galaxies increases with time.”
(p. 556) [2]
- “ the ‘galaxies’ stay the same size during the expansion. This is because gravity and
other forces hold planets, galaxies and clusters and objects within them together in
spite of this universal expansion. People do not stretch because of the expansion of
the universe.” [3]
“ In old-fashioned, Newtonian terms, one says that the Solar System is 'gravitationally
bound' (ditto the galaxy, the local group).” [4]
Others tell you that the glue that holds us together consists mostly of electromagnetic forces:
- “ The simple way to understand the reason you’re not expanding is that you are held
together by electromagnetic forces. These electromagnetic forces are strong enough
to overpower the expansion of the Universe.” [5]
Yet other relativistic sects tell you that the reason objects do not break apart when the space within them
expands is just a matter of assumptions:
- “ Objects that are bound together (for example, by gravity) do not expand with space-
time's expansion because the physical laws that govern them are assumed to be
uniform and independent of the metric expansion.” [6]
Considering that the establishment does not recognize the difference between a proof, a theory, and an
assumption, such inconsistencies in this make-or-break part of their conclusions should not alarm you. Of
course, nobody knows or bothers to check or to prove any of these alibis. They warm seats in college and
accept everything on the authority of the professor. In the exact science known as relativity, different sects
make contradictory statements and everybody just nods. Relativity is a religion that covers all the bases.
That’s why it is un-falsifiable.
I have trouble accepting the gravity and electromagnetism excuses because relativists also propose that
inflation alters the internal structure of photons, the bullets that atoms within your body are shooting at
each other:
- “ According to the big bang theory, space is expanding, stretching light waves as
they move through the Universe” [7]
“ In expanding space, however, not only do individual photons get stretched (thereby
losing energy) but the entire train of photons gets stretched. Thus, it takes longer
than two weeks for all the photons to arrive on Earth.” [8]
Indeed, some relativists self-servingly convert light from a particle to a wave to avoid the paradox:
- “ As the photon travels through space, the space is expanding, so the photon’s
wavelength becomes stretched.” (p. 555) “photons have been redshifted to long
wavelengths and low energies, after nearly 20 billion years of being stretched
by the expansion of the universe.” (p. 561 [9]
“ There are two effects in the universe: expansion causes the photons to spread out
(reduction in number of photons per unit volume), and redshift (change in the
photon wavelength due to the expansion of space) occurs.” [10]
Others use the expansion of space to separate a rocket from its planet:
- “ In the case of the Alcubierre warp drive, this moving section of spacetime is created
by expanding spacetime behind the ship (analogous to where the sidewalk emerges
from underneath the floor), and by contracting spacetime in front of the ship
(analogous to where the sidewalk goes back into the floor). The idea of expanding
spacetime is not new. Using the ‘Inflationary Universe’ perspective, for example, it is
thought that spacetime expanded faster than the speed of light during the early
moments of the Big Bang. So if spacetime can expand faster than the speed of light
during the Big Bang, why not for our warp drive?” [11]
[Why not indeed? And this is authoritative! You should believe it because it comes
from NASA.]
- So we end up with inconsistent relativistic explanations. In one presentation the mathematician argues that
the galaxies are growing apart because the space between them inflates. When you ask him why the chair
he is sitting on doesn’t explode, he tells you without justification that the expansion of space only affects
macro objects like galaxies. The atoms of the chair are held together by gravity, electromagnetic forces,
bubblegum, or whatever. But as you are leaving the seminar, the relativist murmurs that this same spatial
expansion stretches photons and separates tiny spaceships from the surface of space, neither of which
constitutes a macro system comparable to a galaxy. Relativists use selective arguments during particular
presentations to win the debate and then never check to see if the argument contradicts what they said in
another. When push comes to shove, they deny the entire thing and dismiss physical interpretations as
'philosophy.' They claim that such matters don't concern Physics anyways, so who cares what you think. A
mathematician only does math. This is what he calls doing ‘science’.
- As always there is a punch line. It comes at the expense of Olbers’ Paradox. The official version of relativity
is that the night sky is dark because space (or space-time) expands and light from the stars (meaning
particles called photons) has no chance to make up the difference in distance:
- “ after Hubble discovered that the Universe was expanding... Olbers' paradox was
presented as proof of special relativity” [12]
“ While the finite distance for the origin of any received light does not by itself solve
the paradox, the Big Bang Theory also involves an expanding space which can
cause the energy of emitted light to be reduced via redshift.” [13]
The mathematicians are saying that the expansion of space is faster than the speed of light! The balloon
inflates at a rate that leaves the poor photon biting the dust! If, however, both a single photon and a train of
photons are stretched when space is expands, then the explanation relativists offer for Olbers’ Paradox is
absolute poppycock! The light from every celestial object should now be upon us as when the Big Bang
occurred (Fig. 1)!
So Bill? Why is it that you say that relativists are a bunch of stupid idiots?
| Adapted for the Internet from: Why God Doesn't Exist |
- ________________________________________________________________________________________
- Last modified 01/01/08
- Copyright © by Nila Gaede 2008
The mathematical physicists of the world are truly a bunch of stupid idiots. In order to challenge their
ludicrous theories you have to go to every presentation they make, record them, and then confront them
with their contradictions. After thousands of years of twiddling with their calculators, the mathematicians
have no clue as to how the Universe works. Yet they boast in their immense ignorance that their knowledge
of Mathematics gives them an edge over your intuition and common sense. These are the people that sit on
peer review boards and judge your submissions! Now you be the judge.
- 2.0 SR predicts fewer particles; QM and GR predict more particles
The If we now factor in that Quantum Mechanics states that space itself is made of particles, the entire
length contraction argument disintegrates in one fell blow.
- “ Laboratory experiments show that seemingly empty space is actually seething
with virtual particles that wink in and out of existence.” [15]
Relativists explain that the expansion of space is a result of more space being created, which means that
more particles are being created.
- “ Space is expanding everywhere” [16]
So why would space particles pop up between galaxies and not between you and me or within you? If
relativists can’t provide a reason, there is absolutely no excuse to exclude inflation from the length
contraction equation. Relativists first ask you to accept a gravity-free environment for SR. Next, they want
you to believe that the object contracts, meaning that somehow the speed at which it travels strains the
space particles from itself like you would strain water from a mop. Then they ask you to believe that the
creation of space particles within you or between us somehow does not have any physical consequences
despite that the photons inside your body and between us are expanding. You really have to be a gullible
moron to believe this nonsense!
Nevertheless, pursuant to the very own proposals of relativists, the Lorentz-Fitzgerald equation is
incomplete. It is missing a provision for ‘distance particles’ that the theory predicts.
Distance particles? Have you lost your mind, Bill?
Yeah! Distance particles? Do you have a problem with that? Relativists have invented particles of time
(chronons), particles of mass (Higgs bosons), particles of momentum (no name yet assigned), particles of
energy (photon), and particles of space (virtual particle, antiparticles, vacuum energy) which many of them
attempt to detect and others invoke in their papers to explain physical phenomena, so what problem can
you have if they also propose particles of distance? The idiots of Mathematics have invented so much
nonsense that it's unreal!
If more space is being created moment by moment, meaning that more particles of space are being
generated (from the concept energy perhaps?), the distance between any two atoms in the Universe should
also be expanding:
- “ In the example of the universe, for instance, objects recede from you not because
they are in motion, but because space is being created between you and the object.
The universe can create as much space as it likes, even so much that it appears that
distant objects are travelling faster than c.” [17]
Who said that relativity was a beautiful theory? Relativity is a lunatic theory propounded by gawking idiots
who have convinced each other of a whopping Emperor’s Clothes tale. Proponents mutually believe it for
fear of looking dumb or of losing their jobs!
A second punch line – another corollary to Olbers’ Paradox – is that the Andromeda Galaxy is blue-shifted,
that is, it is coming towards us. Relativists theorize that it does so because gravity between the two galaxies
(separated by 2 million light years) overcomes spatial expansion (Fig. 2).
Fig. 1 |
| Special Relativists claim that if you travel at any speed greater than zero, your body contracts. General Relativists claim that more space is created as space-time expands, and the only reason you don't blow up is that gravity and EM fields hold you together. However, they explain Olbers' Paradox by claiming that the expansion of space stretches the photons that make up your body! So SR predicts that bodies traveling at near-c should contract while GR predicts that bodies which have photons buzzing between atoms will expand. |
|
Universe is expanding. While it does so it creates more space between galaxies. The gravity operating between the galaxies is insufficient to overcome the spatial expansion. This explains why they are flying apart from each other. The mathematicians claim to have verified this phenomenon by measuring the red shift, a technique that tells us |
| of how fast a celestial object is running away from you. However, the Andromeda Galaxy is rushing towards us and will probably collide with the Milky Way in a few million years. There should be no reason for the two galaxies to come together if space is being created between us which cannot be overcome by our mutual gravity. |
| I tell you, Bill, that, hic, the wine shrunk. A pink fly zoomed by and suddenly, hic, there was only half a barrel left. |
| Sure Al! Come on now. Upsy-daisy Off to beddy-bye! |
- Module main page: Contraction from the observer's perspective: SR contradicts GR
Pages in this module:
a. SR is flat; GR is curved; the real world is neither
b. This page: SR photons contract; GR photons expand
c. SR diameter decreases; GR diameter increases
