Summary

    For the last 400 years, the corpuscular model of light and the atomic world have driven the development
    Mathematical Physics. The modern version of this billiard-ball world is known as Quantum Mechanics
    (QM), the third pillar of modern ‘Physics’. At its core, QM has three of the most ludicrous notions ever
    devised by man: negative momentum transfer, quasi-particles, and Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle
    (UP). Negative momentum transfer is so absurd that we must either conclude that the mathematicians are
    joking or that they suffer from serious psychiatric disorders. Virtual and quasi-particles are not nouns, but
    verbs, and this makes you wonder how it is possible for the mathematicians to move what is already in
    motion. Finally, the sacred ‘principles’ of quantum – Uncertainty and Complementarity – place the
    observer at the center of inquiry, thus making all inferences subjective. All these far-fetched ideas
    concocted by the mathematicians are really symptoms of the establishment’s impotence to explain the
    nature of our Universe.

    Here I treat QM and the mathematicians that invented this nonsense with the contempt they deserve. In
    fact, sometimes it is difficult to maintain a straight face in light of the mechanics’ gullible assertions. The
    physical conclusions of Quantum Mechanics are not only irrational, but most often comical. They lead me
    to wonder how it is possible for overly-educated people to believe that they are at the brink of scientific
    breakthrough when they are actually on the verge of lunacy. The UP, quasi-particles, and negative
    momentum transfer, together with the round-trip graviton and the one way photon, are examples of how
    otherwise brilliant mathematicians can be bumbling fools when providing physical interpretations to their
    equations:

    " Bell's theorem explicitly prevents any local hidden variable theory from holding true
       because it shows the necessity of a system to describe correlations between objects.
       The implication is, if a hidden local variable is the cause of particle 1 being at a position,
       then a second hidden local variable would be responsible for particle 2 being in its own
       position — and there is no system to correlate the behavior between them. Experiments
       have demonstrated that there is correlation. In the years following, Bell's theorem was
       tested and has held up experimentally time and time again, and these experiments are in
       a sense the clearest experimental confirmation of quantum mechanics." [1]

    Wrong! What these experiments confirmed is that the mathematicians of the world are a bunch of stupid
    idiots. (And I am being conservative with my expletives.) Discrete particles have no way of explaining
    'correlation.' The intermediary must necessarily be continuous. The alleged confirmation of QM that the
    authors talk about is contingent on a corpuscular universe. If this assumption is wrong, the conclusions
    of the mechanics are not only incorrect, but fit for the Funny Farm.

    There are two strategic problems with Quantum Mechanics. This purely mathematical theory purports to
    explain the workings of the subatomic universe in terms of forces and particles.  With regards to forces,
    the problem is the misuse of language necessary to communicate scientific concepts. With regards to
    particles, the argument is simple. If the ‘photon’ and the electron are not particles, Quantum Mechanics is
    a big fat lie. Everything from Uncertainty and Complementarity to the explanations QM provides for the slit
    and EPR experiments to the carefully-crafted Standard Model flushes down the drain; nothing survives.
    Therefore, it is in our best interest to determine whether the photon and the electron could possibly be
    particles. Either they are or they aren’t. It can’t be half way nor can the mechanics have it both ways.

    In the first part of this section, I argue that the mechanics incongruously use the word force as a physical
    object. QM is so divorced from reality and its adherents are so fanatic about billiard ball physics that they
    ended up morphing the adverb force into a particle too. Likewise, the mechanics have converted the
    verbs push and pull into nouns. This is as irrational as it gets in Mathematics.

    In the second part I will argue that, assuming there are things such as particles, they nevertheless fail
    every fundamental experiment and observation known to man. The particle is a very convenient, but very
    incorrect and extremely misleading hypothesis that the mathematicians fall back on to peddle their
    religions. Experiment after experiment has shown that neither light nor the electron can be or consist of
    particles. Yet the mechanics refuse to accept the verdict of the lab. Practically every paper published
    today tacitly or explicitly assumes that the photon and the electron are particles. Some mathematicians
    would have you believe that the photon and the electron merely have 'particle-like' properties. This is a
    veiled way the used car salesman has found of selling you the same lemon in a different way. The
    mechanic is saying that the photon is not a particle, but that he will treat it as a particle for the purposes of
    his presentation anyways. So oblivious are the mechanics to the refuting results of the lab that most are
    not even aware that there is a problem. The mathematicians of the new generation don’t even ask the
    fundamental questions anymore. What is light? What is an electron? Such trivial matters don’t concern
    them these days. They have more important business to tend to, especially since Bohr set this issue
    squarely in the hands of the philosophers. The mechanics now use concepts as their building blocks
    (virtual particles, wave-packets, tachyons, solitons, phonons, etc.). In fact, the new generation of
    mathematicians doesn’t even do Quantum any more. The mathematical morons coming out of the
    universities these days have moved on to String Mathematics, a topic I will take up in another module
    since the only purpose of String Theory is to explain gravity. Nevertheless, since String Theory is
    founded upon Quantum Theory, many of the objections I raise here applicable to both.

    Module main page: Main Page

    This page: They don't call it Quantum Magic for nothing!

    Pages in this module:

    ________________________________________________________________________________________


     Home                    Book WGDE                    Glossary                    Extinction   

    Last modified 04/26/08


        Copyright © by Nila Gaede 2008
Adapted for the Internet from:

Why God Doesn't Exist
They don't call it Quantum Magic
for nothing!
There's that lousy trio from the sixties singing 'That Old Black Quantum
Magic' and 'Puff the Magic Virtual Photon' again. I can't stand them. I think
it's time for me to save humanity the agony and do a little bit of real magic!
Counter