Adapted for the Internet from:

Why God Doesn't Exist
How the mechanics pull you
by throwing stones at you

    1.0   QM explains gravity as retrograde motion

    If both GR and QM are impeccable mathematically and they both explain the real universe, which should
    you choose to explain gravity to your kids? Should you tell them that a parachutist falls through relati-  
    vity’s warped space, but, as he nears the ground and distances become shorter, quantum gravitons take
    over and drag him the rest of the way?

    Baez’s infamous University of Riverside Physics web page, a bastion of relativity and quantum, seems to
    lean towards QM’s particle version. The site explains that a quantum graviton transfers ‘negative
    momentum’ to the target (Fig. 1). [1]  Think of momentum as motion. Mathematically, momentum has been
    defined as (mass times velocity) since the days of Newton and, therefore, ‘motion’ is still a good
    approximation for momentum in our present context. There is no such thing as 'static' momentum.

    Let’s put Baez’s ‘negative momentum’ proposal in familiar terms. Baez says that when the pitcher throws
    a baseball charged with retroactive motion, the catcher is dragged towards the mound. Baez Physics FAQ
    site proposes that it is particles pushing down on you that keep you from flying into outer space:

    “ pressure causes gravitational attraction... In fact, any object of mass M will form
       a black hole if it is compressed to a radius smaller than its Schwarzschild radius” [2]

    He urges the reader to believe in the graviton on the basis that its existence is predicated on impeccable
    mathematics.

    I have to believe that this is a joke, a caricature of Physics. Perhaps Mr. Baez moonlights as a standup
    comedian and I just happened to stumble upon a site frequented by a surrealistic claque. Then again,
    what makes me think that he and his buddies may be serious about what they say is that I read similar
    accounts in other 'scientific' bulwarks:

    “ antiparallel momentum and velocity, is observed.” [3]

    “ atoms have negative momentum” [4]

    “ effects of virtual graviton exchange” [5]  

    In case I could have perchance misconstrued what the mechanics are saying, Bugel says it so that a baby
    can understand it:

    “ The best description of what happens in quantum field theory is that the
       exchanged particle carries negative momentum - not an easy thing to
       visualize.” [6]

    [I bet!]

    McIrvin confirms this ‘official’ mainstream version of Quantum at Baez's Physics FAQ website:

    “ If the momentum transferred by the wave points in the direction from the
       receiving particle to the emitting one, the effect is that of an attractive force.”  [7]

    [Transfer momentum? Sounds like the nonsense we debunked here!]

    So again, I was not mistaken.

    Allow me to spell it out. The idiots of Quantum Mechanics are saying that your heart attracts your liver by
    pitching negative-momentum-carrying stones at it. They urge you to visualize an abstract messenger
    transferring the momentum it ‘carried’ on its back to the liver which reacts by moving closer to the heart.
    The mathematicians sincerely believe and say that there is a particle called a graviton which carries a
    force and delivers this negative push to another one (Fig. 1). They add that this idiocy has never been
    falsified.  (I doubt that anyone could. How do you falsify Alice in Wonderland, Little Red, and Snow White
    anyways?). You can either believe the Emperor's Clothes tale Einstein's idiots are trying to sell you or join
    the growing crowd of dissidents and begin to stone them to death!
I won the race against that
buffalo by relying on
negative momentum, Bill. I
learned at Quantum School
that you run much faster
when you run backwards.

    ________________________________________________________________________________________


     Home                    Book WGDE                    Glossary                    Extinction   

    Last modified 04/27/08


        Copyright © by Nila Gaede 2008

    Stenger tells us why he and his peers have willed themselves to believe this nonsense:

    “ to a particle physicist raised on a diet of Feynman diagrams, motion backward in
       time is not all that disturbing. All fundamental particle interactions work backward
       as well as forward and, with rare exceptions, do not distinguish between directions
       of time.” [15]

    Oh, I see. Well. Maybe a mathematician and a particle can’t distinguish between the future and the past,
    but a sober physicist can. The mathematicians can do anything with math and prove anything with
    statistics, but does this make you more comfortable with their conclusions about gravity?

    Of course, the tough part is producing ‘negative momentum’ at the bowling alley. Nature has so utterly
    fooled the mathematicians – they have been burnt so many times – that they no longer consider possible
    mechanisms. The outrageous explanations of quantum show that you can justify absolutely anything
    with equations. The educated mathematicians will believe any garbage, and Quantum advocates will go
    out of their ways to protect their beloved religion.


    3.0   Conclusions

    In conclusion, the proposals of Quantum Mechanics – negative momentum and reverse time –  show that
    we cannot rationally explain the force of pull with particles. The particle is simply an incorrect model and
    should be discarded by serious researchers. Any explanation involving particles should be treated as a
    Ptolemaic system and ridiculed. Pushing gravity people should be cleaning latrines rather than manning
    ‘think tanks’. They don’t have the gray matter to tackle Physics.

    " One might wonder, how can pushing cause attraction? ...This sounds like a
       contradiction. The solution is: The pushing of positive pressure (and the pulling
       of negative pressure) are non-gravitational forces which just move substances
       around within space without changing space itself. But the gravitational attraction
       (or repulsion) they cause operates on space itself, decreasing (or increasing) the
       amount of space between things." [16]

    [Oh brother! What a contorted explanation to say so much bullshit!]

    This is the appalling nonsense the mathematicians believe in after so many years in college!

    QM postulates a world of particles, where even a force (a concept) is a particle (an object). Such a world
    relies exclusively on billiard-ball physics. The incongruous thing about the Quantum version of this
    popular 'game' is that the mathematicians cannot reproduce what they are proposing at the pool table.
    They cannot strike the ball with a cue and deliver negative motion to the 8-ball. It has never happened
    anywhere other than in the corridors of the Departments of Theoretical Physics of universities around the
    world. Therefore, a 'hands-on' experiment in the lab resolutely falsifies the theory proposed by Quantum
    Mechanics, but no one pays attention to contrary evidence any more. The mathematicians give lip service
    to experimentation nowadays. Today, all experiments are gedanken (thought) experiments. The
    mathematicians play the entire game of billiards in their heads. That's how they can get away with telling
    you on the one hand that a graviton donates negative motion and on the other that a photon bounces
    against another:

    “ A complete theory of reaction (3) does not exist at present so we performed a
       simulation based on a two-step model in which the beam electron emits a virtual
       photon... and the virtual photon combines with laser photons to yield electron-
       positron pairs” [8]

    [Burke is saying that particles of light have the ability to bounce off each other.]

    Of course, Baez will never confess that this is just a mathematical 'model'. He will present Burke's
    speculation as a fact:

    “ In quantum electrodynamics, light can scatter off light with the help of a loop of
       virtual charged particles.” [9]

    A graviton is a peculiar particle that carries negative motion on its back (momentum in mathematical
    jargon). When a graviton collides with an atom, it unloads this retrograde motion and the receiving atom
    moves closer to the source.  Think  of  negative  swimming. That’s the physical interpretation the
    mathematical idiots of QM give gravity. Of course, to add weight to their arguments and in anticipation of
    skepticism and ridicule, the mechanic must add that this explanation follows logically from equations and
    that all Nobel Prize physicists believe in it.

    This breathtaking explanation opens up a Pandora’s Box so tantalizing that I barely know where to begin.
    Firstly, the mechanics offer no explanation for how the graviton avoids collisions with the countless
    particles of matter that constitute everyday objects, not to mention the particles that theorists tell us
    comprise the vacuum.

    “ Common sense tells us that a vacuum is nothing, or more precisely that it is
       empty space. However, in general relativity theory the vacuum isn’t simply that…
       For Quantum physicists the vacuum is much more complicated…the vacuum,
       which generally appears empty, is somehow packed out with electrons…
       experiments really have shown that the vacuum can produce particle and
       antiparticle pairs.”(pp. 100-102) [10]

    Then, the mathematicians define momentum as the product of velocity and mass. [11] [12] Velocity is a
    vector quantity, which means that the object in question has direction. [13]  This makes momentum also a
    vector quantity and reduces the concept of negative momentum to an oxymoron – something like: ‘an
    object that moves in the direction opposite the direction it is moving in’.

    But for graduate level university students and professionals to actually propose that a micro billiard ball
    strikes another and pulls it (through itself?) towards the cue simply boggles the mind. I think that a safer
    bet is that the students and their professors are a bunch of morons! This conclusion is easier to live with.

Fig. 1   

QM’s unattractive logic:
Negative-momentum transfer

(A particle shooting a particle at
a particle)

Fig. 2   

QM’s unattractive logic # 2
Time reversal Sequence:

1. Graviton sneaks up out of
nowhere from the future and
pushes target from behind.

2. Target moves closer to source.

3. Source shoots graviton at target.
[Don’t you just love QM!]

    2.0        Time travel

    Brown explains that the reason momentum ends up being negative has to do with time. The particle
    travels so fast that it ends up coming from the future! But make no mistake. This version is really negative-
    momentum-transfer in disguise:

    “ Since the forward-going transfer represents a repulsive force, and it is cancelled
       out by the backward-going transfer, it must be the case that the latter represents
       an attractive force. This is the same as saying that the momentum of a photon
       propagating in the negative t direction is negative, which is consistent with what
       we would calculate for the momentum of a massive particle going backward in
       time based on the definition p = d(mv)/dt. It can also be understood intuitively by
       considering the time-reversed version of ejecting an object, which is not to receive
       a thrown object, but to capture (draw in) an object, thereby resulting in the
       opposite momentum transfer.” [14]

    [You what? Hey Joe! Call the men with white jackets! We got another loose
     Quantum screw!]

    If Brown is serious about what he writes, we should be concerned about his mental health. In less
    contriving words, he is saying that a bowling ball travels so fast (perhaps because the bowler has such a
    strong arm) that it literally pulls the pins from the future. In Fig 1, I assumed that gravity transfers negative
    motion from the front. Following Brown’s instructions, in Fig. 2, I must assume that the graviton
    moonwalks and ends up donating positive momentum from tomorrow.
The Quantum Wizard is the most intelligent being
that ever lived. He is absolutely daunting. He can
solve any problem of Physics. You should do
everything in your power to try to find him.
What? You're the
Wizard? I traveled the
entire Yellow Brick Road
just to find you? What
cruel world we live in!