Adapted for the Internet from:

Why God Doesn't Exist

    Let’s now look into the true source of the problem with the hypercube of relativity. The hypercube,
    tesseract, space-time, or whatever the idiots of relativity wish to call their 4-D contraption, is comprised of
    motion. It consists of a cube that has expanded uniformly in every direction. A hypercube is a still image
    of a movie of an inflating cube.

    “ a true 4D-sphere can only be shown properly in animation! No printed material can
       possibly depict such an object appropriately…since time is the fourth dimension,
       every object with four dimensions has to appear as moving… else it is merely a
       familiar ‘static’ 3D-object.”   [1]

    “ But what sort of thing must the object be in order to present itself in such different
       ways in various perspectives without being different from itself? The answer can by
       now be anticipated: the object must be four-dimensional, it must be extended in time
       as well as space. It will then have different 3D shapes in different perspectives
       because such shapes will be intrinsic properties of its 3D parts.”  [2]

    “ The problem we have is in trying to visualise these four dimensions because we can
       only see the three dimensions of space, we cannot 'see' time.” [3]

    A hypercube is not a geometric figure, but a collage of different sizes of cubes superposed on each other.
    The numbskulls of relativity inadvertently have converted this ‘movie of an inflating cube’ into a static
    ‘solid.’ When Sagan says that he cannot show you a tesseract, it is not because we unfortunate 3-D
    beings are stuck in Solidland. The reason has to do with the fact that we are not looking at a static
    sculpture. We are looking rather at a statue that is getting bigger by the minute and we are attempting to
    visualize it in a single frame of the film. The reason we cannot visualize or see a tesseract has nothing to
    do with our limitations as 3-D beings. It has solely to do with the fact that relativists are presenting an
    irrational hypothesis. The tesseract is its own contradiction, a self-falsification.
What really is a
Tesseract?

    But this is not the amusing part. The truly funny part starts when the Neanderthals of relativity, in their
    immense ignorance, begin to rotate the hypercube itself! Relativists forget that this was a movie of an
    expanding cube, treat it like a solid, and begin to rotate the resulting ‘object’ they call hypercube.

    “ When finished, you'll be able to rotate the tesseract”  [4]

    “ The movie depicts a rotating spacetime hypercube”  [5]

    Aristotle cautioned against such idiocy over 2000 years ago, but relativists don’t seem to read his books,
    perhaps because it is Greek to them:

    “ there cannot be motion of motion or becoming of becoming or in general change of
       change.” (Bk. V, Part 2)  [6]

    Relativists believe they are rotating a geometric figure when what they are really rotating is a movie of an
    expanding cube! In their frantic zeal to spread their religion at all costs, the mathematicians have ended
    up moving motion itself (Fig. 2).

    So Bill! Why is it that you say that relativists are a bunch of idiots?

Fig. 1   Mathematical Logic
A hypercube is not a
geometric figure, but rather a
‘construction.’ The idiot of
Mathematics makes a collage
with several frames of an
expanding cube. The ‘4-D’
tesseract is an attempt to see
this movie in a single image.

Fig. 2   The day Pastor Al twirled the week
In each of these 3 films (horizontal images) we
see a movie of a cube becoming larger. The
hypercube is a collage: cubes of increasing size
superposed on one static image (Fig. 1). The
relativistic 4-D ‘object’ is actually a movie of an
expanding cube synthesized in a single
photograph or movie frame!

Relativistic surrealism doesn’t stop here. The
idiots of Mathematical Physics now rotate the
movie itself. The relativistic director makes a
movie of the Super-macho hypercubes!
According to the establishment (if we use
relativistic jargon consistently), a rotating 4-D
hypercube consists of 5 dimensions: 3 spatial
and 2 temporal! The idiots of relativity are
rotating time itself! They are treating time as a
physical object!

    ________________________________________________________________________________________


     Home                    Book WGDE                    Glossary                    Extinction   

    Last modified 01/25/08


        Copyright © by Nila Gaede 2008
Well, you see, Bill.
The tesseract is a
little more
complicated.
Just as scary is that rotation is not simultaneous with inflation. The cube is not expanding while  it  
rotates.  The mathematicians  must  wait for  the expansion to stop so that they can build their first
hypercube. This movie becomes a single frame in the director’s new film. Every frame in the movie
‘The Rotating Hypercube’ is itself a movie.
When you told me that you were
going to show me a tesseract, I
thought you were going to point to a
stand-alone geometric figure, Steve.
Click here to see a rotating tesseract. If you look at the film carefully, you will see that the rotating
tesseract consists of one box constantly moving out the end of another one. The stupidity of
relativists has no bounds.


    Pages in this module: