Summary

    Special relativists allege that the length of an object and the distance in its direction of travel contract simply because of the
    speed at which it travels. They claim to have derived these supernatural interpretations from equations and to have proven
    them with experiments.

    First, I argue that we don't need numbers and equations to resolve these qualitative issues. In science, logic always preempts
    math and precedes the design of an experiment. Then, we can't prove these allegations with an experiment if we cannot even
    design the experiment first.  There is no way to design the experiments of Special Relativity because they are based on
    unimaginable conditions. A more fundamental problem of the conclusions of Special Relativity is that the mathematicians
    attempt to move concepts.

    I show here that the entire length contraction  theory of Special Relativity is founded on misconceived terms. Specifically,
    Einstein's birdbrains confuse length with distance and distance with distance-traveled. The surrealistic physical interpretations
    of Special Relativity trace their origins to poor definitions and irrational logic.

    Module main page: Special Relativistic Nonsense

    This module: Relativists don't understand the difference between distance and distance-traveled

    Pages in this module:


Relativists don't understand
the difference between
distance and distance-traveled
Adapted for the Internet from:

Why God Doesn't Exist
Of course!
length = distance = distance traveled
What don't you understand, Bill?

    ________________________________________________________________________________________


                                  Home                    Books                    Glossary            




        Copyright © by Nila Gaede 2008