Summary

    Special relativists allege that the length of an object and the distance in its direction of travel contract
    simply because of the speed at which it travels. They claim to have derived these supernatural
    interpretations from equations and to have proven them with experiments.

    First, I argue that we don't need numbers and equations to resolve these qualitative issues. In
    science, logic always preempts math and precedes the design of an experiment. Then, we can't prove
    these allegations with an experiment if we cannot even design the experiment first.  There is no way to
    design the experiments of Special Relativity because they are based on unimaginable conditions. A
    more fundamental problem of the conclusions of Special Relativity is that the mathematicians attempt
    to move concepts.

    I show here that the entire length contraction  theory of Special Relativity is founded on misconceived
    terms. Specifically, Einstein's birdbrains confuse length with distance and distance with distance-
    traveled. The surrealistic physical interpretations of Special Relativity trace their origins to poor
    definitions and irrational logic.

    ________________________________________________________________________________________


     Home                    Book WGDE                    Glossary                    Extinction   

    Last modified 06/15/08


        Copyright © by Nila Gaede 2008

    Module main page: Special Relativistic Nonsense

    This module: Relativists don't understand the difference between distance and distance-traveled

    Pages in this module:


Relativists don't understand
the difference between
distance and distance-traveled
Adapted for the Internet from:

Why God Doesn't Exist
Of course!
length = distance = distance traveled
What don't you understand, Bill?
Counter