Adapted for the Internet from:

Why God Doesn't Exist

    One of the most intuitive notions that mathematicians have in the back of their minds is that an object is
    what is comprised of matter. This means that an object is that which has mass and occupies space.
    Mathematically, this version of object is expressed with concepts such as mass and volume:

    “ the substance or substances of which any physical object consists or is composed…
       something that occupies space”  [1]

    “ matter: Anything that occupies space, has mass, and possesses inertia.”  [2]

    “ All matter is composed of tiny particles (atoms or molecules)”  [3]

    “ All matter has mass, which is a measure of the quantity of matter. And all matter has
       volume, which is a measure of the space that matter takes up.” (p. 3)  [4]

    Actually, this is what the word matter means to the idiots of Mathematics. It is not what the word matter
    means in Physics.

    Nevertheless, the establishment doesn’t use these definitions of the word matter consistently. Routinely
    you will read idiotic statements in the ‘scientific’ literature that blatantly violate these foundations. The
    proponents allege that there are objects that have mass, but don’t occupy space, or that neither have mass
    nor occupy space:

    “ The photon is one of the elementary particles…photons have zero rest mass” [5]

     “ point particle: It's distinguishing features are that it does not have any volume or
       surface area; it is zero dimensional.  [6]

    “ black hole: A massive astrophysical object… The gravitational forces are so strong
       in a black hole that they… collapse to a point (known as a singularity)”   …“singularity:
       A singularity has a set mass but an infinitely small (zero) volume”  [7]

    [Forces collapse to a point? An infinitely small volume is a zero volume? What do these
     people put in their coffee? How can they be so stupid?]

    So, aside from the fact that the mathematical physicists haven’t reached an agreement, the decision of
    whether mass and volume qualify as acceptable parameters depends on their definitions. I have already
    shown that mass and volume are not synonymous with object, but hopefully all objects possess these
    properties.
Newton says
that an object is
that which has
mass and
occupies space

    ________________________________________________________________________________________


     Home                    Book WGDE                    Glossary                    Extinction   

    Last modified 01/12/08


        Copyright © by Nila Gaede 2008
No, I have no mass and I
don't occupy space. I just
get lonely women pregnant.