Adapted for the Internet from:

Why God Doesn't Exist

    In order to determine objectively and unambiguously whether a word represents an object, we will use a single criterion: shape.
    If we can point to and name an image, it is by definition an object. Otherwise, it is either a concept or space.

    Plato argues that a shadow is an object and, in principle, he appears to be right.  The word shadow meets two requirements:
    shape and single-word. For example, an extraterrestrial (ET) may not be able to distinguish between a true object and a
    shadow by simply looking at a 2-D image – we can just as well call 'it' X. However, a shadow also fulfills the criteria of a concept.
    The prosecutor must allude to a second object to explain the word shadow. The tiebreaker is that a shadow does not have a
    shape of its own. A shadow is not a standalone object. Without the tree, we have no shadow. This becomes obvious when we
    take the object into deep space. The object has shape. The shadow doesn't (Fig. 1).
Is a shadow an
object or a
concept?

        Fig. 1   Me and my shadow
A shadow is not a stand-alone
object. This is easily demonstrated.
Here on Earth, a cube has shape and
casts a shadow. If we take the cube
to outer space, the cube continues to
have shape. It's shadow doesn't.
Without a physical object, there is no
such thing as a shadow.
Of course I'm not a
physical object! Can't
you see that I don't
cast a shadow?


    ________________________________________________________________________________________


                                  Home                    Books                    Glossary            




        Copyright © by Nila Gaede 2008