Adapted for the Internet from:

Why God Doesn't Exist
The mechanics
say that a
particle
carries a force!

    ________________________________________________________________________________________


     Home                    Book WGDE                    Glossary                    Extinction   

    Last modified 01/04/08


        Copyright © by Nila Gaede 2008
Ordinary people like you Bill don't
understand what we mean in
Quantum when we say that a
particle 'carries a force.'  Let me
show you what we really mean.

    QM postulates that particles carry forces

    Like other cults of Mathematical Physics, the mathematicians of Quantum Mechanics were compelled to
    develop incongruous language in order to convince each other and the world that they could explain
    reality. Perhaps the most important term of QM is force. The word force is to Quantum Mechanics what
    space-time is to General Relativity and time to Special Relativity: the bread and butter of the theory.
    Without force, QM is bankrupt. Therefore, we have to get to the bottom of this strategic word if we are to
    learn anything about quantum.

    The cutting-edge Wolfram Physics site defines the word force like any ordinary dictionary: 'a push or a
    pull'. I think that this definition suffices to get the idea of what normal people mean by force. No one in
    their right mind confuses the verb pitch with the object baseball or say something stupid like that a
    baseball carries pitch.

    Therefore, it is perplexing to discover that Wolfram also proposes the existence of four particles that
    ‘carry’ forces, to wit: gravity, electromagnetism, weak, and strong:

    “ Force-carrying particles can be grouped into four categories” (p. 69) [1]
     
    Did Hawking say ‘carry’? I’d like to think that this is a misprint, for how in the world can anyone
    conceptualize particles carrying a force? Is an ant getting a free ride on a tennis ball?   

    “ A theoretical particle having no mass and no charge that mediates (carries) the
       gravitational force.” [2]

    “ the graviton is a hypothetical elementary particle that transmits the force of gravity
       in most quantum gravity theories” [3]

    So I was not mistaken. The mechanics are saying that a force is 'something' that an ant carries like a
    backpack (Fig. 1). The mathematicians are indeed saying that the tennis ball has a passenger. Is the term
    'carry a force' just  a metaphor? If yes, what do the mechanics really mean?

    Well, maybe I'm just a little sensitive about language. After all, Wikipedia does clarify that fundamental
    forces such as gravity and electromagnetism are not really particles but ‘interactions.’  Thank God! I feel
    much better now. For a moment there I thought that Hawking,  et al.,  were saying that particles ‘carry’
    forces. Silly of me! It turns out that they really carry interactions,  and sometimes charges,  and others
    energy and momentum and…

    “ we call the particles which carry the interactions force carrier particles.” [4]

    “ The photon is one of the elementary particles…, but they do carry energy,
       momentum and angular momentum.” [5]

    “ The fundamental particles of QCD, the quarks and gluons, carry a new form of
       charge, which is called color” [6]

    “ Gauge bosons are bosonic particles which act as carriers of the fundamental
       forces of Nature.” [7]

    Why would the mathematicians invent such contorted language to describe a phenomenon of nature?
    What's the reason for this Ptolemaic explanation? Wasn’t it simpler and more accurate to say that a
    particle pushes another than to say that it carries and then exchanges a force? Imagine telling the judge
    that you carried your jump and unloaded it when your feet smashed the victim’s hand. He would lock you
    up and throw the key away! Do you perchance say that you carry and exchange your jump? An analysis
    of the QM carriers shows why it was necessary for the mathematicians to invent this ridiculous jargon.

    Nevertheless, if it was easy to conceptualize how an outgoing billiard ball transferred its portion of push
    to another, it was much harder to visualize how the incoming billiard ball transferred a chunk of pull to the
    8-ball. If Quantum has a weak spot it is that it runs into insurmountable trouble generating the force of pull
    with discrete particles.

Fig. 1

Quantum ‘carriers’ of force

The mechanics call these
'carrier' particles the
graviton, the photon, the
Ws/Zs, and the gluon.

    Pages in this module: