Adapted for the Internet from:

Why God Doesn't Exist
Density is what
overturns a
pyramid

    A population pyramid pits age against numbers. [1]  By looking at one, you can instantly tell whether the population is young
    or old, or whether the growth rate is increasing (Fig. 1). The older a population gets, the more it is guaranteed to decrease
    because one phenomenon feeds on the other. The process is self-sustaining and exponential. The older a population, the
    fewer children it has. A dearth of children, in turn, results in an older population. The dearth of children coupled with better
    health and living conditions leads to a geologically swift aging of the population which leads to further declines in the birth
    rate.

    ________________________________________________________________________________________


     Home                    Book WGDE                    Glossary                    Extinction   

    Last modified 03/03/08


        Copyright © by Nila Gaede 2008

Fig. 4   Inversion superimposed on total population

Fig. 1   The population pyramid overturns

    What we are witnessing today is the geologically swift overturning of the global population pyramid. An urban population
    ages for several reasons, among them:

    a.      Women stop procreating as a result of density, a consequence in turn of socio-
    economic reasons.

    b.      Adults enjoy better living conditions and access to health services. Therefore, the
    majority of individuals live up to their natural life spans. In the past, this wasn’t
    possible because disease and poor living conditions cut life short.

    c.       The reproductive age bracket is squeezed from two sides (Figs. 1 and 3). The
    average age of first pregnancy rises as women postpone having families until
    they can afford children or until they can fit them in their busy schedules. As the
    population increases and becomes older, women in the reproductive age bracket
    become a smaller percentage of the population. Since individuals have fewer
    children, the average age at which they have their last child decreases. Agrarian
    women died young and on the average had children towards the end of their lives.
    Urban women live twice as long and end up having children somewhere near the
    middle of their lives.

    These factors have led the average age of the world population to increase dramatically in the last couple of decades and
    promises to continue doing so in the very near future. Demographers have estimated that at the start of the Christian era the
    average age of the world population was probably around 16. There were relatively few old people and lots of young people.
    Many children died before reaching puberty. This level changed little over the next few centuries. By the year 2000, however,
    the average age of the world population was around 27. This average is expected to climb to 40 in just three or four decades
    (Fig. 2). Best 71 offers a parallel trend: longevity. He tells us that life expectancy in the Roman Empire was about 22. By 1800,
    it had climbed to about 40. Today it is closer to 80. These statistics indicate that the pyramid is overturning rapidly in
    geological terms (Fig. 3).
A population pyramid depicts the population mix. It pits young versus old and males versus
females. A young population is characterized by a pyramid with a broad base and thin apex.
This is the case of tiny, agrarian populations of which a good example is the Greek city state.
An old population has a narrow base and a broad apex. This is the case with Man today. In
new species, the population rises and most individuals are below the reproductive age
bracket. In old species, population declines and most individuals are above the reproductive
age bracket.
In the 19th Century, most people still lived in rural areas and the population
was young. Late in the 20th Century, Man became an urban species (we
nucleated in cities and abandoned the land to agri-corporations). The
average age of the population has risen dramatically and will continue to
do so as women stop procreating. Our species will soon attain ZPG and,
subsequently, we can expect population  to decline. Unless we can
stimulate fertility again, this leads to extinction. What will get us to jump-
start birthing again?
The Pharaoh would
probably never
believe what
became of it!

Fig. 3   And getting older

Fig. 2   Background extinction: The population pyramid overturns
A young population is characterized by a broad base and a narrow
apex. As fertility drops and longevity increases, the population mix
suffers a transformation. Gradually, there are ever older people and
fewer young. This leads to a population pyramid overturn, in part,
because the reproductive age bracket is compressed in relation to
global population.

It is unlikely that the reproductive age bracket remains constant
throughout the lifetime of a species, but, because population
increases swiftly towards the end of its life cycle, it is impossible
for the age bracket to rise significantly in such a short geological
period of time to make any difference.
In the past, the global
population was quite
young. It is estimated that
the average age in the
Roman Empire hovered
around 16 or 17. In the year
2000, this number climbed
to 27, and in only 30 or 40
more years it is expected
to jump dramatically to 40



    The first question the rise in average age raises is whether urbanization, which is responsible for pyramid inversion, was
    inevitable. The second question is whether the most intelligent of species can find a way to reverse this process if
    necessary… because if we can’t, it will necessarily lead to the extinction of our species (Fig. 4)!